Reach out to the help desk if you intend on exporting data from the Atlas of American Gun Violence. They will make the process frictionless.
The Trace is doing phenomenal work streamlining gun violence research. Access their hub for loads of datasets!
The CDC Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) is a reference point for all of the amazing datasets the CDC has collected/compiled.
NVS: While not gun specific, deaths from all causes from every county in the United States is published by the CDC National Vital Statistics System.
WISQARS: CDC Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System allows you to see fatal, nonfatal, and cost of injury data.
NVDRS: The CDC National Violent Death Reporting System publishes data on violent deaths including homicides, suicides, and deaths caused by law enforcement acting in the line of duty.
There are multiple datasets, ongoing and historical, focusing on gun violence.
The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) inquires about gun carrying and violent behavior in a nationally representative sample. You can conduct individual level analyses using other survey questions.
The Trace published a helpful guide to using the CDC WONDER system. You can access it here.
This innovative program based in a University focuses on developing and assessing gun violence interventions in the local area. Interesting information for innovative programming.
Many gun violence and public health studies use place-based indices to capture neighborhood context. This table, from an upcoming paper (Feldman & Slavish, in preparation), highlights common problems with indicators frequently included in these indices. Being thoughtful about what we measure and why is especially important when the outcomes we study (e.g., gun violence) reflect the downstream effects of structural inequities that disproportionately affect communities of color.
Much of social determinants of health research has become de-politicized, with work increasingly focused on downstream, individual-level conditions rather than the upstream agents and power dynamics that produce them in the first place. Applied to gun violence research, this critique is especially salient. As the authors note, housing discrimination through redlining dating back to the early 1900s in the USA still contributes to disparities in the geography of gun violence, with these consequences predominantly faced by Black communities.
Keeping this political takes many forms, but at its root it means identifying the agents and power dynamics that shape structural determinants (see Figure below; detailed in manuscript). That looks like naming specific agents and decisions (e.g., a particular piece of legislation, a court ruling, a funding restriction) rather than gesturing vaguely at “policy.” The authors also encourage an expansion of who counts as affected. For example, a study of the 2002 Beltway sniper attacks found that in-utero exposure to the three-week shooting spree increased low birth weight and premature births in affected areas by 25%, nudging us to remember that the costs of gun violence extend far beyond its immediate victims. As mentioned above, this includes thoughtfully operationalizing structural exposures.
Transparently, I haven’t read these but they are on my TBR. These books are highly rated/recommended.
As I find more resources, I will update this page! In the meantime, I would love to hear from you! What gun violence research are you currently working on?